And the saga continues…

I’ve written before about Formula One and the near-farce that was the 2007 season. I’ve also written about Lewis Hamilton, rookie challenger who so very nearly won the Championship this year - missing out in the final race, to trail eventual champion Kimi Raikkonen by just one point. Well, things are moving again today.

Max Moseley, president of the FIA and pretty much boss of Formula One, has been talking to the BBC about the season just gone and the 2008 season to come (check this link for the BBC’s story). I’m not a big fan of Mr Moseley for two reasons; first, I don’t think he really has the best interests of the sport at heart and second, he and the organisation he controls, seem to be inconsistent and biased with their rulings. Let’s take a few examples from the BBC report:

He thinks that Lewis Hamilton being successful will have a negative effect on the sport: “It will start to be negative because we’ll get the Schumacher effect where people start writing to me saying can’t you do something to slow him down”. I don’t remember hearing him making such a statement when Schumacher was racing, or when Alonso won two Championships on the trot, or when Ferrari were winning the Constructors Championship every year. There is well-known ill-feeling between Moseley and McLaren boss Ron Dennis - is this perhaps why he feels a successful McLaren driver would have a negative effect?

Surely if one driver or team is consistently successful, it’s up to the other drivers and teams to raise their game to compete. Formula One is supposed to be the pinnacle of motorsport; it is a competition for supremacy. That supremacy can only come from being the best, consistently. Is Mr Moseley suggesting that (as with schoolchildren now) there should be no winners or losers - everyone is equal?

He goes on to suggest that if it wasn’t Hamilton who was drawing people to F1, it would be one of the other new young drivers like Nico Rosberg, Robert Kubica or Sebastian Vettel. Perhaps if they’d been driving the McLaren they might have been more successful this season, but these three have not lit up the scene in the way that Hamilton has. Strangely, as he appears to be a big Ferrari fan, Moseley makes no mention of Felipe Massa, who surely has made more of an impact on F1 than any of the other three drivers he did mention.

Making reference to the McLaren-Ferrari “spy-gate” affair, Max Moseley says “although the behind-the-scenes stuff was annoying for us and the people concerned, for the public it really adds to the general interest.” Not sure I agree on that one; what the spying affair did was really throw into sharp relief the inconsistent way that the FIA applies its decisions. It was shown that there was two-way flow of information but it was not proved that McLaren had used Ferrari technology on their car. Ferrari do not appear to have been subjec to the same scrutiny. McLaren were robbed of their points and the Championship was basically handed to Ferrari who, up to that point, were completely out of the running. Yet Ferrari ran an illegal car in the first race of the season and escaped any punishment.

For 2008, McLaren will be “closely scrutinised by the FIA to ensure the team had not included any Ferrari ideas on it.”. Quite how they’re going to be able to determine this is not stated, but Moseley says “Finding something will not be easy. On the other hand, there are sources we are going to deploy who will give us as good a chance as its possible to have to find it.” Which seems to be saying that they’ll find something even if there isn’t anything to find.

When asked about Hamilton’s involvement in the spying row (Alonso and test driver Pedro de la Rosa were shown to have been involved, from email evidence they submitted), Moseley says “He’s not a known quantity to me. It would be surprising if he didn’t know something of what was going on, but I’ve got absolutely no evidence that he had. On that basis it would be wrong of me to suggest that he had.” Even though that’s exactly what you’ve just done, Max.

Formula One is supposed to be a development sport; it’s for prototypes (like MotoGP is with bikes). That development will inevitably lead to one team having new kit, or new ways of working, that give them an advantage. The other teams will then try and find out what those are. The recent row is perhaps a little more direct than its ever been before - with two top designers swapping information over the phone - but its part and parcel of the sport. Of course, the fact that they’re talking about a 10 year ban on engine development from 2008 rather makes spying a waste of time.

Formula One used to be a must-watch sport but no more. The ridiculous amount of new rules (especially the utterly stupid “two types of tyre must me used in the race” rule), the inconsistency of application of those rules and the boredom brought to the track by the stifling of technical development just make it an expensive irrelevance. I’m not so sure I will be paying any attention in 2008.

- - -
All opinions in this blog are either my own or else they’re made up just to get a rise out of you and make you angry. Either way, they’re probably not very well thought out or expressed so do yourself a favour and don’t take the world so seriously.

:: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::